Board Thread:Fun and Games/@comment-3015137-20150629213942/@comment-3015137-20150701135754

24.118.224.255 wrote: I'd have to say Iorveth as well. Not because I like him so much or anything, but because of his major importance in the Witcher 2 and absolutely nothing in 3. I understand WHY he wasn't there (with Aedirn getting owned by Nilfgaard and all) but it seems a shame for everyone who followed his path in 2. I agree, that he should have been in the game. In 'Imperial Audience', Morvran specifically asks which path Geralt took in Witcher 2 after Flotsam, and the choice should've had some consequence in Witcher 3, which could've included meeting Iorveth instead of Roche.