Thread:Mechemik/@comment-5965245-20191021115606/@comment-5965245-20191022072638

Never once have I seen bureaucrats consider their opponents' reasoning and end up yielding the absolute establishment-granted superiority of their personal opinion as opposed to such of their opponent.

My on-topic points pertaining to the disputed edit are clearly outlined in bullet points above if you decide to consider and discuss them instead of rule-wanging only when you feel like you can bend them to back your point and abandoning them when they don't suit you.

Keep in mind, I'm fed up with the class you represent, this is hardly personal so far.

"An edit war occurs when editors who disagree about the content of a page  repeatedly  override each other's contributions,[…]"

"[…]power-drunk enough to lock an article for a  single revert "

Looks like it's time to abandon this ship rule, bureaucrat, it's sinking under you.

The guideline you quoted merely suggests a way to resolve disputes (which I wouldn't be against if I didn't know how your cards are stacked in advance), the rule I quoted expressly limits your actions, yet you simply ignored, decided to not even address it.