Talk:Triss Merigold/@comment-19281228-20160629030655/@comment-27334094-20171025145044

'' Just to play the devil's advocate, it's somewhat up to interpretation if that's because he couldn't find her attractive at all, or because he knew it would've been wrong because of his family, and Triss and Yennefer being friends. ''

I do agree that the books are up to interpretation to some extend but when the whole saga is about one love story you can't really say that the love is up to intepretation. Geralt's fling with Triss wasn't even described, even Lytta Neid and Fringilla Vigo got more book romance scenes with Geralt. Why Geralt didn't stay with Fringilla? He even said to her that he loved her in his own way... Sapkowski wrote Yen for Geralt, he said it himself. Questioning why Triss isn't main love interesting in the books is pointless.

'' What if he never met Yennefer before? ''

What if Aragorn never met Arwen before? What if Romeo never met Juliet before? What if Tristan never met Isolde? What if Orpheus never met Euridice? I personally see Geralt and Yen absolutely in succession of these famous lovers of literature and mythology. In fact I believe that that is the main point why the Witcher book series exists in the first place. It is a myth/legend about two lovers that were never meant to be and their impossible child.