Thread:Mechemik/@comment-2103046-20191223054600/@comment-27075564-20191223064517

Allen Knott wrote: I understand that an admins, have to deal with a lot of opinions. I used to be an admins on other wikis. But that is my point. The previous summary is opinion-based not based on the lore. The netflix lore is different from the novels lore. Hint there should be seperate tabs.

This too has also been discussed at length among the admins. In short, because we combine all the works on character main pages (books, the major 3 games, minor games like the RPGs, comics, etc.) it wouldn't make sense to remove Netflix from it but have everything else. Therefore the main pages act as a collective for all the lore information.

Allen Knott wrote: Just because the admins agreed to something, doesn't mean they are right. What does Netflix have to do with anything? They are just the platfom the series is on.

I wasn't disrespectful, in my opinion. Nor I'm trying to push my opinion. I'm just pointing out how clealry the lore should be keep seperated that included pictures. If someone who never read the novels, go the character page, they should see what the character is reflect as in the main tab vs the netlfix tab. As several of the characters are different in the Netflix series i.e. race, and hair. And that is also your opinion. You are free to do what you wish on the wikis you admin, some choices you make I'm sure not everyone agrees with or finds right. But just like every community, there are different admins who you may not agree with but at the end of the day, if you can't abide by a particular community's guidelines, then you shouldn't be going in and making changes simply because you disagree with them. You wouldn't like it if someone did that in the ones you admin, so have respect and don't do it in other's. Also to clarify, Netflix is backing this wiki regarding the series, so they actually do have a say in some of the formatting/styling going on. So no, they're not just being brought up because they've released the series in a screen adaptation.

Allen Knott wrote: Regardless, you still should never threating anyone with a ban, on the very first time. That is in poor form and disrespeactable, in my opinion. We don't have full time jobs to monitor everything, therefore temp bans allow us to serve that purpose. Most cases, as was done for yours, a warning is given, both in the summary and the comments. If an edit is particularly egregious, it's outright banned but this is only for blatant vandalism. As your edit wasn't this, you were issued a warning like everyone else who changes into simply because they disagreed with the premises. This is to make sure we cut off any further edits that'd have to be fixed before it goes off the deep end. You may not like how this is done, but again, that is your opinion and you're free to decide how you run things on your own wikis but not how we do it here.