Talk:Triss Merigold/@comment-96.54.186.184-20160925204659/@comment-96.54.186.184-20160927203714

Re TomasDastan

I completely agree with how people shouldn't try and twist or create facts to support their beliefs. However, in a way it could be argued that the Geralt in the books is still 'your' Geralt. After all it's your personal interpretation/viewpoint of the books and the characters/events that are in them. That's not to say that your intepretation is wrong in any way, it's just that someone else could interpret the books in their own way that may support beliefs that you disagree with, using the exact same things to support their theory that you've used to support yours. Is that person's interpretation 'wrong'? Who's to say?