Thread:Mechemik/@comment-3082279-20190206201645/@comment-174.116.217.40-20190206205027

Thanks for the prompt reply. I understand this rationale, but I don't agree with it.

- The extra information remains helpful for pages where the referenced header has not changed, which is the case at least as often as not, right?

- When the header is is changed, the automatic effect is the same as the result of the edit, so the edit does not acheive any useful functional effect even in those cases.

- The edit does not actually save any storage space, as the original remains in the history - it actually increases it. The space saved in the transmitted page is small.

- Not sure what your definition of a "relavely small" page is. I would say that the qualification reduces reader effort significantly whenever the page is significantly longer than the average window. On those terms, the pages in question are not small.