Talk:Northern War I/@comment-24019656-20191217084447/@comment-24019656-20200206171912

But I just gave you an example of real life Northern wars in anglophone literature that aren't called Northern War ONE and TWO but First and Second. It is never used for anything besides WW1 and WW2. I mean if I saw a book on medieval Warfare calling Fourth Crusade, Crusade IV because it's easier I'd LMAO XD.

It is convenient for you and me but it will confuse people who are new to the series and treat the wiki as infalliable source of canon information. People use info from this wiki uncritically (saw it on clickbait article) mainly because wikis for major fandoms are assumed to be notoriously strict.

You might see youtubers making videos calling the wars Nilfgaaardian War One, Northern War TWO and the like ;) . I'm not against you calling the wars Northern War I,II,III in articles especially those with a lot of text but at least the title of the page for the wars themselves should be more "official" and literary. I mean If someone can't follow First, Second and Third Northern War and needs it shortened to I, II and III then I don't know what to say. I won't push it, I see you reverted my changes and I wont try again and force my opinion. (Had bad experiences on WoWpedia with very vain people, when I make a mistake I always admit it, those guys...) It's just a friendly suggestion.