Talk:Ladies of the Wood/@comment-51.7.85.210-20180728033633

I'm with the save the children lobby. I'm also with the Anna is evil lobby. It's fairly natural for a guy to want to kill the person that's been boning his wife. And yes (dimwit that wrote the rant about how horrible Phillip is) in those days wives WERE considered the property of men, and in ACTUAL HISTORY were until comparatively recently. We are talking about the 1200's here!

I am also with the person that called the villagers superstitious idiots despite the fact that in paradox with my previous statement superstition and even sacrifice were just a part of everyday life back then. BUT, from a moral standpoint there is no excuse for an abusive husband - this doesn't mean he should DIE for a few drunken arguments. By the same token children are innocents and anyone that allows their children to be taken off into the woods and never seen again, however misguided they are in believing they will be safe and "want for nothing" (well they got that right since they wont want a thing when they are dead), they ARE the people that deserve to die - if any. Anna is unfaithful, practicing dark arts in her basement, making deals with evil THINGS including killing her unborn child..so to dare to defend HER as the product of an abusive husband is laughable. So who dies if you save the spirit..a bunch of idiots that sent their own children off to die, a crazy cheating corrupt woman who basically made a deal with the devil, it's a shame if phillip dies as well but at the end of the day he was a drunken slob that beat his evil headshot cheating wife so we can overlook his death. And the innocents - the ONLY innocents in this tableaux, are saved. I'm with the tree spirit all the way.