User blog comment:Qraanberry/Confused about Triss and Yennefer's relationship?/@comment-390665-20111119121209/@comment-46.119.133.220-20150615181246

Triss hid Yennefer's existance from Geralt on purpose. She told him about her only when Geralt himself began to remember Yen and his past. So of course she would tell him, when directly confronted with something like "hey, wtf Triss, there was a woman I loved more than life? and you didn't mention her all this time?". EVEN if Triss thought that Yennefer died, there is no way you (as both Yen's and Geralt's friend) will not tell about his past and love of his life. Triss just wanted Geralt for herself, it was her chance. So she didn't mention Yennefer - Geralt had amnesia and she could trick him whatever way she wanted.

Also we know that Lodge knew about Yennefer being in Nilfgaard. Triss was with Lodge all this time (she was contacting with Lodge both in Witcher 1 and Witcher 2 games), so there is no doubt she knew about Yennefer too. Once again - not a single word. But wait! She tried to help Geralt to restore his memories, right? To find Yennefer! If she knew about Yennefer being in Nilfgaard, why would she do this?

Rose of rememberance was used in Witcher 2 game by Philippa to completely subdue Saskia's will. Now it makes more sence, right? Triss saw Geralt remembering Yennefer on his own and "tell him" about magic Rose of rememberance that can help (yeah, nice timing, Triss - why never you mention it before, if you were trying to help wih memory loss?)

I am sorry, it is obvious, that Triss played dirty, but plays innocent. Typical jealous hypocrite bitch.