Talk:Wild at Heart/@comment-80.244.92.65-20171030212132/@comment-2600:1004:B048:EB69:2C68:916F:DE75:5B53-20190712113937

Your argument about the sister commiting a "crime" by leading her sister, the werewolf's wife, into the woods to see him is LAUGHABLE. For the record, being a POS person and a jealous ass is not a crime. Yes the actions resulted in her death, but not by the sister. The wife froze, paniced even, and the werewolf did what werewolves do. The only one that could even remotely be classified as "guility of murder" be it involuntary manslaughter or homocide (lol that those terms even came up!) would solely rest at the feet of the werewolf.

Once again, being a terrible person is not a crime. If it were, most people would not be walking around free. You referenced a vehicle accident but you didn't compare it properly. In order for the comparison to work you have to be comparing the details of events in a similar fashion.

If I said to you, hey, come follow me over here I want to show you something. I drive my car, you follow me in yours. When we get there, something goes wrong, there's a major accident of some kind or an explosion and I turn around and drive away, you freak out and panic or your car doesn't start and you get stuck there and blown to bits. "I" wouldn't get in any trouble for that.

That's what happened here. She said, I want to show you something in the woods,l come follow me. the wife followed her sister. When they saw her husband turn into a werewolf and start to come closer, the sister turned to run and the wife froze or freaked out or something and the wolf tore her to bits. The sister was a jealous POS that had terrible motivations for doing what she did, neither of them had no business being out there, but the sister did not commit murder, involuntary or otherwise. True it's her fault that they were both out there to begin with, but THAT isn't the crime, that's just a bad decision.


 * sigh* everyone thinks they're a lawyer. lol