Thread:Mechemik/@comment-37377389-20181104052601/@comment-37377389-20181104081646

This is exactly what I wanted to talk about.


 * About Coleman, please notice that the information describing his death is already categorized under one of the condition, which is giving arms to scoia'tael. I see no reason to repeat what have just been said literally 1 line eariler. Besides, that excessiveness is not the primary reason why I changed it, it's because it's factually wrong in saying "they will kill Coleman as soon as Geralt speaks to Raymond the detective". This gives the impression that Coleman dies as soon as you visit the detective, rather than what really happens in the game(he only dies the next time you enter the inn after you've talked to raymond). This is easily verified by doing The Rat quest to where you need to meet coleman on the dike, go visit raymond, then check the dike and coleman is still there and alive. Sure, the difference is pretty small, but if it's wrong, I feel it should be changed.


 * About marking journal entry condition. I believe you're talking about the edit I made on Vizima Confidential, that I seperated the Phase "Vincent or Money for the Detective" to independent ones and added condition on Phase "Money for the Detective"? I'm using bulleted points because it was used on that entry to specify the condition. But of course, if indent & italicize is the current style, I can do that. But just to be safe, by bulleted points you mean the little square before a line we are using right now, correct? Sorry I got to ask, not a native English speaker.
 * About breaking format for forking quest direction, I believe I only did it on two quest, Vizima Confidential (Phase "Vincent or Money for the Detective") and What Lies Beneath(Phase "Confrontation / Azar the Detective"). I understand they are very major edits, however, the reason is that I believe in both case the directions is not mutually exclusive, yet the wording used indicates it. For Vizima Confidential, it's the usage of word "or"(besides, these two phase isn't even different directions in the first place, phase "Vincent" happens no matter what). For What Lies Beneath, it's the mutually exclusive conditions, which naturally implys the phases are that way too(it's not, the two phase can happen in either order). Thing is, I'm not too sure about the style to use to best describe these kind of phases and diffrenciate them from mutually exclusive ones, so these edit are more preliminary ones to clear things and get the info straight without worrying too much about formatting. I'd like to see your thoughts on the format to use.
 * One more thing, since I've found more info in later phases but haven't had the time to experiment with and verify them, as well as writing work for the info I do have verified, there will be a lot of editing for chapter 2 investigation coming. I think it would be counter-productive for both of us to kind of "edit-warring" on every little detail. So what I want to propose is that regarding pages related to chapter 2's investigation, you let me finish the things I wanted to do, but inform me about errors or out-of-format, etc with messages and I will fix them myself.