Talk:Jad Karadin/@comment-98.254.149.249-20160913185103

I'm not sure it's all that clear that Karadin is lying. All we really have to go on is Lambert's info, and even if we assume he's being truthful, he could have simply jumped to conclusions or been misled.

A lot of weight in this article seems to be given to the fact that Lambert establishes Aiden as a professional while Karadin says he botched the job. However I do believe Lambert himself said Aiden was not successful on that particular contract and the girl did die.

I frankly don't know which side to believe, and wish there were some more information available, or we could at least ask both Lambert and Karadin some more questions.

However I think I'm leaning towards believing Karadin is not worthy of saving. Lambert claims Karadin is involved in the slave trade, and it would make sense if he was partnering with Hammold still, though his letter claimed otherwise. This is probably the most damning piece of evidence in my eyes, and  is what I would really like know more about. The article seems convinced that Karadin's knowledge of the trade is evidence he's part of it, but he could simply know of it because he's a merchant in the city.

Even if he's guilty of the murder of Aiden, he might be a changed man attempting to do some good donating to orphans and what not. Killing him wouldn't bring back Aiden, but it would deprive his new family of their father/husband. But if he really is a slave trader, then he's not quite as saintly as he tries to seem, is he?