Talk:Contract: The Tufo Monster/@comment-23914617-20181004061508/@comment-37050166-20181103121214

Maybe we are all insecure and oversensitive.

However, I don't think it's a witcher's job to do anything but kill a monster and/or fulfill a contract. This is really the end of my "argument". However, a few more TLDR points...

Following is my opinion.

People play games to experience things they can't in real life, to relax, to socialize, to escape from reality, a more I am sure. In real life you couldn't do something like this, so we can vicariously experience it via this quest even if it is potentially small minded and spiteful from Geralt's point of view. Does that transfer back to us the gamer? Maybe. Interesting debate here but I would say that for most people the answer is no and that the choices we make in games are to elicit feelings that make us want to play games, which are numerous as mentioned earlier but largely to experience novelty.

I don't think we can push our morals onto others especially other from different locations, times, and realities such as games/books. Thus a "cheating vixen" may not be something morally inappropriate. I get the feeling that it is a faux pas given other quests such as Goodness, Gracious, Great Balls of Granite! Though, one case does not prove the rule. I know I am standing on shaky ground on this one though.

Also, if you talk to the innkeeper from the Flovive, you can hear quite a few negative things about the quest giver. I'd have to reload a save but I think there are other random dialogues from other NPCs as well indicating the quest giver is not a great individual by their standards. So, I don't think you can say SOLELY given this.

Your comment is very interesting. If there is not already information available derived from studies connecting a player's personality and their gaming choices/habits, I hope more information will come to light.

-Have a good one :)