Thread:Bizippo/@comment-27075564-20190104002151/@comment-3131473-20190117233837

Yeah, that's one of the reasons opt for approving canon-frienly fan-arts, so that I could just put the illustrator's name and don't have to deal with descriptions :P especially since, uhm, providing such info could be viewed as unprofessional? Optionally, we can label the art as bought specifically to honour the lore... but if editors of wiki were able to buy art for it, then, heh, one would ask why to buy it since many artists draw fan-arts for free.

Another point, more altruistic rather than worrying on spent money – since Wikia is Fandom now, and seems to encourage ppl to take part in various fan activities, why be so strict with official art only? A lore is a lore, and an art, whether official or fan, is just a depiction of it. As we can see across games, comics etc, depiction often not even fitting each other.