Talk:Triss Merigold/@comment-85.194.6.49-20190504212149/@comment-94.197.120.79-20190623193006

@Mechemik There’s unofficial sequels and spin-offs for both the books and games so that means nothing. And the inconsistencies are a mistake by the devs. People make mistakes, especially when they have so much material to work with. There’s numerous examples of books, films, games etc that make mistakes but are no less canon.

Ciri disappearing happened in the books and is explained in the games. Vilgefortz fighting Regis happened in the books and is explained and discussed with the correct timeline. Triss mentioning Geralt attending a banquet with Yen is told. Dijkstra mentions his leg being broken by Geralt in the books, in the game. Geralt and Yen’s first meeting is mentioned in the game exactly how it was in the books. I could go on but you get the point. If they aren’t on the same timeline how and why are all these events that happened in the books marked correctly in the game? Your argument holds no merit.