Talk:Andrzej Sapkowski/@comment-95.122.117.115-20180522201755/@comment-151.95.75.164-20180922121910

Well first off Andrzej is a jerk, an ignorant one. Because he simply denies the fact that the Witcher games made his franchise an international success and NOT his awesome writing skills.

Well I can´t confirm that Eredin is an idiot in the games. I interprate it as greed standing so close to success which probably made him overconfident. And about the persuing thingy I think he wanted to ultimately kill Geralt so that he couldn´t intervene with his plans any more. Furthermore it´s the most logical option because he has the ability to travel instantaneously with his Navigators.

The goal of the Aen Seidhe was to colonize the "Geralt-World" due to the withe frost, which was correctly portrayed in the games. Of course he needed to start a war against men to gain land.... but he did not do that in the games his only goal was to capture Ciri.

Well I can´t say much about that pregnant thing.

About the death of Geralt and Yennefer due to the angry mob... well..... In the game it was portrayed that Ciri had resurrected them I think some time after the mob has calmed down on an orchard away from the village. So it´s perfectly lore-friendly.

To the Ciri Emhyr relationship. In the games it is portrayed that Emhyr wants his daughter back even if she did not like that (which was the case). So for the sake of a good game CDPR created three endings... the best one (imo) is when Ciri becomes the apprentice of Geralt and ultimately a non mutated witcher. I can´t say much about the Emhyr Ciri end which you told about... but what I can say is that in the last sequence it was told that Ciri was named as Queen... as I understand it as his successor and not to replace him.

The lady of the lake scene in the expansion was quite against the lore.. I agree with you. But a Nymph raising of the lake looks better that a woman. ;)