Talk:Leo Bonhart/@comment-178.221.226.220-20170609163846

Seems a lot of comments here talk about Leo vs Geralt. While, not all witchers are equally good fighters, from the books we can see Leo was great fighter. Witchers were trained to fight monsters, but they could kill people easly since they were much stronger and faster then regular humans...on the other hand, Leo was never an ordinary human..Why do I say this ? Because he had a lot of expirience in sword fight and he was probably the best bounty hunter in whole North. It is completely possible for him to kill witcher as any expirienced bounty hunter. Remember, Vilgefortz was great bounty hunter and mage after that that gave him great advantage over Geralt as he smashed him. We do not know how good were those witchers Leo claimed that he killed....and again it is possible to kill witchers, they are not invincible! Geralt indeed went through more mutation than any other witcher and in some way was maybe little bit more powerful than other witchers, yet, that does not mean he is owning all the other witchers. Eskel is even more powerful in using sings than Geralt. What I personaly think is that Geralt is best swordsman from all the witchers out there. There is a part in  books where humans and elfs gather around some tree, there are some great warriors there and they talk about Geralt. Many people and warriors consider him the best swordsman in whole Northern Realms. Conclusion, I think, Geralt would beat Leo, but Leo could definitely kill some witchers!

 AllImagesVideosNewsMapsMoreSettingsTools