I think Sapkowski's work should have its own tab that would contain things I listed before. His books are the highest canon possible and they are to be treated that way.
Books should contain only Sapkowski's work since we have 2 short story collection, 5 saga books, 1 dynastic notes and 1 presequel. Comics should be in Other.
As much as I like your idea Sniper, I suppose we should really have a large tab for the Book Saga by Andrzej Sapkowski, since it is as important (if not more) as games. And let us not forget Netflix is working on a Tv show. What do you think?
You mean something like this The Witcher 2 books, just for the third game right?
Well, I like it too.
Books and game only? Shame, I would pick Rennes for his awesome moustache if comics were included.
Yeah that might be just right.
But he was runing through forest and two witchers, one being Lambert, found him. I am confused.
It's flashback from very begining of first game and yeah, these should be added. I am leaving the honors to you ;)
Description: the Trumbull is a unique creature that guards the gate of a high tower. You'd have to kill him to get access to the huge treasure that can be found inside. He has the head of a human, but the horns and body of a Highland Cattle as his existence is the result of the crazy King Frederick's liasion with a cow. The people of a nearby settlement regard him as a sacred animal and will attack you as soon as they notice that you have killed the Trumbull.
Is he trying to make North great again?
Gulfwulf, you are an admin, and I respect your stance. However, the articles were moved without any discussion or consent in the first place. Why then were they not immediately reverted? Why are they now being allowed to remain incorrectly titled until there is discussion? I get the impression that, had I not come to the forum in good faith, discussion would not have been necessary. That's a bit disconcerting.
Furthermore, Juraj103, it would be beneficial if you could provide a reference from a game or novel that can reinforce your statements. After an extensive online search, I can find no single instance, outside of the wiki articles you edited, of where your "School of the (animal)" format is used.
I have no one to discuss with in that time, I was only active admin here :)
I've noticed that all of the articles relating to the Witcher schools have been renamed from the "(animal) School" format, as they appear in the books and games, to a "School of the (animal)" format. To my knowledge, the latter (current) format has not been used in any Witcher-related media.
This appears to have been the work of a single contributor, Juraj103, who gave no explanation as to why the moves were made. Also, some of this contributor's edits to the information within said articles seem to be based entirely on speculation.
I would like to motion that the titles of the articles be reverted to the "(animal) School" format, as to reflect accuracy and continuity with the source material. I was hoping there could be some discussion/consensus on this in order to avoid editing conflicts.
School of the (animal) format is used in last game (The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt) and some graphic novels also. And its also more correct, something like Kingdom of France and French kingdom if you understand me :)
+Joooohan See you after than glorious event of yours :)
Roach, Siegfried, every Toussaint baron from books etcetera.... there is hell´a lot of them :D
Yes you should play Witcher 1 (and than Witcher 2 ) after books, it is not much important but its a lot better with knowledges from previous materials :) Also comicses are good but they are trivial Trilogy and Saga are most important
Since the witcher 3 its changed and now (first ever known) is Barmin (master of Vesemir)
Chloe my top favourite too.
Plus here's Saoirse with red hair, a perfect Iola the Second:
Dunno maybe contribute to articles from the Witcher universe ? :)
Do not want to spoil your fun and all that but, should you use a bit of that activity to realy help wikia ?