FANDOM

A FANDOM user
  Loading editor
  • I noticed that you make a lot of repeated edits on the international Elder Scrolls wikis and wanted to know if you are using some sort of automated tool to do so or if you are doing so manually. People have tried to reach out to you before about this but you don't ever seem to respond so if you could get back to me that would be appreciated.

      Loading editor
    • I'm not a bot; I'm doing it manually.

      Also, I've only had one person ask me about this before, and I responded to them. Whether or not other people have tried to contact me, I did not get notifications about it.

        Loading editor
    • If you're not a bot then you edit with surprising predictability and accuracy. Your edits are usually in strings each spaced almost exactly 1 minute apart and go on for days at a time. This month you've made edits in this pattern for 20-days in a row.

        Loading editor
    • Well, thanks! I copy and paste a lot, and use categories and special pages to quickly find groups of pages that need edits. As for the 20-day streak – I have far too much free time on my hands.

        Loading editor
    • Reply to my message in GTA wiki spanish

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Hi, I just recently made some changes to the Easter eggs page and if you could help sort out the misc. stuff into more appropriate categories, that'd be great (or if you have another suggestion for a main tab. I don't know yet if folklore/mythology should go elsewhere or have something like "Legends" tab).

      Loading editor
    • This reply has been removed
    • My thinking is that we should have a separate tab titled "Folklore", which would contain all things relating to mythology, legends, etc. We could also have a "Miscellaneous" tab where we put the rest of the topics which, individually, don't have enough entries to warrant separate tabs. What do you think?

        Loading editor
    • Sounds good to me. I may end up just keeping miscellaneous on the main page though due to there being limited space left for tabs.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Can you, please, avoid mentioning the game itself at intro text and biography , when character is concerned? Take Benoit's page as an example. For these things we have appearences in infobox and references.

      Loading editor
    • View all 22 replies
    • Definetly agree

        Loading editor
    • We have them listed there because they're like that in the Prima Guides (grouped in with all the other quests). Events might be too confusing, so maybe do something instead like "unmarked quests"?

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Hello there,

    I noticed you put the spoiler tag to the Wild Hunt Page. We decided with both Juraj103 and Bizippo that we will no longer use them for articles wit book info. The main reason is that the books are out in US for sufficiently long time now. Here is Juray´s oppinion on that:

    "Look, the idea to have separate pages for Duny/ Emhyr, Borch/Villentretenmerth, Saskia/Saesenthessis... was good maybe until last year, but currently? Many people who come here already know who these characters are, with their dual identities because books are for more than a year out and games? They never bothered with throwing novel spoilers (you learn Emhyr is a father of Ciri at the beginning of TW3, alternative card for Villentretenmerth shows Borkh and this goes for Saskia/ Saesenthessis as well).

    It is like if Wookiepedia had a sole page for Anakin Skywalker and sole for Vader, or Harry Potter Wiki for Tom Riddle and Voldemort. These dual natures were betrayed sometime ago, and this applies for the witcher as well. ScorpiO is not the first man who saw it unfit to have two pages for Duny and Emhyr, he was first to approach me with it though. In the case of Borch, well it was always that when someone typed Villentretenmerth on google or here on the wiki, then an article about Borch emerged so that much for the spoiler I guess. 

    Wikis always contained spoilers and with time I came to a conclussion that spoiler is something of importance for 1y or so, after that it ceases to be spoiler. What you think?"

    That is why I would like to ask you to not return it to the Wild Hunt page ;)

    Anyway, I wish you a nice day ;)

      Loading editor
    • View all 14 replies
    • well I do not say it is a problem. It just..I don´t know, feels strange to have a disclaimer on every single page. I think one general disclaimer should be enough. ;)

      Anyway, if you want it on every page, then Ok ;)

        Loading editor
    • Yeah, I get that, only one minor problem with that: those on mobile devices can't see the main page that we see on desktop, and the majority of our views are through mobile atm.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Hi, I need your help with this as I notice you edit a lot of items for the games. As you do so, can you remove "The Witcher 3 / Hearts of Stone / Blood and Wine items" category from them as long as it's in another related category (like how all the base game books are in The Witcher 3 books category, which is a sub category of The Witcher 3 items). I want to make the wikia more mobile friendly but to do that, the items category needs to cleaned up drastically.

      Loading editor
  • I appreciate the History section and its info you added on Mount Gorgon but next time, please, also add reference from where you took the information. If it is from book (does not matter if in-game or real) then be sure to write it in italics. You can inspire here: Anséis.

      Loading editor
    • View all 56 replies
    • Ok, how about now?

        Loading editor
    • Mhm, can be. At least one thing resolved :P

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • I need to thank you for what you are doing here :)

      Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
Give Kudos to this message
You've given this message Kudos!
See who gave Kudos to this message
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.