FANDOM

A FANDOM user
  Loading editor
  • Good afternoon, Mr. Juraj.

    I was wondering if I'd be allowed to translate some of the pages (mostly those that are book related) to Croatian. I've recently come into possession of The Last Wish and Sword of Destiny, and I plan to obtain Blood of the Elves and Time of Contempt on my earliest convenience.

      Loading editor
    • Good one to you too.

      Naturally (honestly ;) I wouldn't be offended if you joined the team here, too).

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Hello

    Sorry to bother you, but I personally believe Mechemik is abusing his power as an Admin, at least in terms of forcing his opinion on an edit that was made in good faith, with seemingly no justifiable reason. He hasn't used any Admin tools in this per se, but I do feel that his Bureaucrat and Admin title gives his opinion more weight on edits (especially when he's forcing it), even though it's really not supposed to according to the terms of the site. Rather than continuing to engage in petty squabbles over it, I've chosen to refrain from making any further edits to the site, as I wish to avoid this type of madness in the future, and this type of thing usually has a tendency to repeat itself.

    I'm not looking for any sort of resolution in this matter, I just want to bring it to your attention in case this does happen with someone else.

    You can find the details here: 

    https://witcher.fandom.com/wiki/Thread:110626#7

    Cheers

      Loading editor
    • Hello there Aiki,

      I'll be genuinely sad to see you go as I'm always when passionate fans leave due to a disagreement with someone in the admin board but I accept your resolve and understand the reason.

      Wish you success in future, whatever the endeavor!

      Juraj the Bureau

        Loading editor
    • She just likes the revert button, we've all been through it ;)

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Hello Juraj (long time no see)

    (píšu raději v AJ ať zachovám nějaké to dekórum)

    I have been taking look at the timeline and sure I know, Timeline in the Witcher universe is something kinda impossible because Mr. Sapkowski did not really followed his own dates and made it really impossible.

    however I have a question that you might be able to answer. 

    The Season of the storms clearly statest it takes place in the 1245 yet on the page, it is stated that the year is incorrect and should be much later based on the dates of the saga. My question is this - what exactly indicates that? I ask because I was trying to make some internal chronology - Geralt´s birth and sacking of Kaer Morhen and I kinda used this date as a jumping point, But now, I am no longer sure as it might me wrong. 


    Could you please tell me what was the "info" that point you to the conclusion that the year 1245 is wrong? (or point me to other admin that knows ;) )

    thank you very much and I wish you very succesfull new year ;)

      Loading editor
    • View all 12 replies
    • Replying late but nevertheless doing so is becoming my sort off speciality ehrm... Yes! Our archives are still largely incomplete so if you feel like adding missing book information, you're more than welcome to do so ;)

        Loading editor
    • Great. When i am home, i will take a look. Probably I eill start with triss as she is not that prominent in the saga ;)

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Hi Juraj!

    I'm a huge fan of The Witcher books and games, and I can't wait for the upcoming Netflix show.
    I was wondering what I could do to help out on the wiki and I noticed that the The Witcher Wiki has recently had a revamp of new backgrounds and a new header to match the upcoming Netflix TV series. I am a graphic designer and I thought I would have a go in photoshop creating a new logo for the wiki header based around the Neflix show's title design. Let me know what you think and if you think I should change anything, and of course if you like it then you are more than welcome to use it on the wiki header! :)​​​​​

    The Witcher Wiki Logo

    The Witcher Wiki Logo

    ​​​​​​Full resoultion image: https://imgur.com/PHVo9KA
      Loading editor
    • View all 7 replies
    • It actually shows up in miniatures sometimes when I link a wiki page xD

        Loading editor
    • Wait what? Oh dear, that's not good xD Ok I'll fix that later today then.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Is it really good to have people of whom we do not know name of labelled as "unnamed"? That could potentially mislead the readers that, let's say, Dijkstra's kids died before he was able to name them.

      Loading editor
    • I put it that way to note that they do have children (or spouse, brother, relative, etc.) but we don't know their names. Unless you can think of a better way to note that? Unfortuantely trying to use "unknown" doesn't really work here as otherwise that could apply to everyone theortically that they have unknown parents (just never met them) rather "unnamed" notes they do recognize they knew their parent, sibling, etc. just we (the readers) were never told their names.

        Loading editor
    • I'd personally prefer just "a wife" and "a number of children" in case of Dijkstra and others

        Loading editor
    • Eh, using "a" doesn't really fit well grammatically. For example, say you have someone who was married more than once but didn't know the names of one of them. It'd read like "a wife (deceased), Lily" which doesn't go well together. Essentially "a" only works if there's a single name in that related field.

        Loading editor
    • :<
      
        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Hey there! How are you?

    My name's Chris and I'm a Fandom Wiki Manager as part of the Movies/TV vertical.

    I am currently redeveloping Netflix Wiki to be the go-to place for all things Netflix. We want to feature all the Netflix Original shows and be the place to go for fans of Netflix to find out about the shows they love.

    The best bit? We are actively encouraging these users to visit other wikis about that content, including this one. Our detailed The Witcher article links to this wiki extensively in the infobox and main article body, encouraging users to find out more about the show.

    For more about how Netflix Wiki operates, please do read our Frequently Asked Questions page and/or ask me.

    We would love to have your help on the wiki! We've made a start on our The Witcher article, but if you see anything else to add then please do! Be sure to add links to this wiki if you need to.

    Do you watch other Netflix shows? We want to feature every Netflix Original and any new articles you could help create would be greatly appreciated. You could even join our Discord server!

    I look forward to hearing from you. :)

      Loading editor
    • Hello!

      I'm pretty good, thanx for asking. From the get go: neat idea and brilliant work so far. I’ll of course contribute if I find anything missing and I believe our wiki will benefit greatly through cooperation with this endeavour of yours.

      While we’re at it, I’ve got to ask you: could you help us strike down Netflix Witcher Wikia? The community here firmly believes it's redundant to split fans' attention. With your amazing Netflix Wiki it becomes even more obsolete. We tried to contact the admin there but he’s inactive.

      I’m not much of a Discord guy but will, if it’s okay, gladly continue communicating here.

      Thank you!

        Loading editor
    • (Juraj refers to this one as the unnecessary; I wrote to its admin some time ago proposing to join forces instead of splitting them, but no reply)

        Loading editor
    • Hi guys! Thanks for getting back to me. I really appreciate the positive feedback on Netflix Wiki, it's been a group effort and we're getting the rewards!

      I'll have a chat with the team and get back to you re the other Witcher Wiki. Thanks for bringing that to my attention! :)

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Hey there are some videos embeded on the site that cannot be edited. Some of them are not best quality. Is there a chance of changing some of them? 

      Loading editor
    • If you mean the videos which appear above some articles, well, then there's unfortunately nothing I can do because these videos are not added her by us but the Fandom Inc staff. Many of us admins don't like them there either but alas.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • I've found out there is at least one time when a term "Lower Angren" is used in Baptism of Fire, in reference to the area where Ysgith is located. Could it mean that the Angren in the books is in fact Lower Angren, and there is another area called "Upper Angren" in Dol Angra, as on Komarek's and RED maps? That would be similar to Sodden case.

      Loading editor
    • View all 11 replies
    • Hmmm, interesting. Could it perphaps be that the Lower Angren and Upper Angren are divided by an unnamed tributary as Bizi said? Perhaps the one mentioned in that Polish TWRPG expansion?

        Loading editor
    • The Roen is tributary of the Newi, not of the Yaruga.

      I'll simply write there are two regions referred to by Angren. I have a headache though.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Hello,

    My name is Caio Roberto and I'm a journalism major in college. I'm writing my undergraduate thesis which is gonna be about the Witcher Wiki and I wanted to know if you, as an admin/bureaucraft, could help with some  usefull information.

    Thank you very much,

    Caio.

      Loading editor
  • Hey! Do you remember me? I'm this person. Just changed my account.

    Anyways I'll be quick, someone reccomended me that I contacted you if I had some question about the witcher universe, so that's why I'm here.

    Remember my ugly maps I made some years ago? Well I'm remaking them, and I'm having problems figuring out where the borders should go. I want to put the borders where they are at the start of the saga, that means the first book, do you think this is a good reference?

    That's all for now, saludos!

      Loading editor
    • Hello there, been quite some time!

      Yeah as far as using CD Projekt-made map as the shape of this world, the particular version you linked is preeety close but:

      • At the start of the saga, Cintra is not yet absorbed into Nilfgaard
      • Sodden + Brugge arent vassals of Temeria yet at that point (they actually belong to Cintra)
      • Aedirn Gorne (Upper Aedirn) is Aedirnian
      • Angren's status is unknown at the beginning of the saga but it surely doesnt belong to Temeria

      So... that's that.

        Loading editor
    • TBH this map's Angren isn't even the Saga's Angren :P

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
Give Kudos to this message
You've given this message Kudos!
See who gave Kudos to this message
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.

Fandom may earn an affiliate commission on sales made from links on this page.

Stream the best stories.

Fandom may earn an affiliate commission on sales made from links on this page.

Get Disney+