Witcher Wiki
Register
Witcher Wiki
Line 85: Line 85:
 
::::[http://img154.imageshack.us/img154/9349/wwid9.jpg WW]
 
::::[http://img154.imageshack.us/img154/9349/wwid9.jpg WW]
 
::::They do look like they are missing a chunk in a way so personally I prefer the current layout. However our bureaucrats are free to overrule me ;) [[User:GhostNWN|GhostNWN]] 13:16, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
 
::::They do look like they are missing a chunk in a way so personally I prefer the current layout. However our bureaucrats are free to overrule me ;) [[User:GhostNWN|GhostNWN]] 13:16, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
  +
:::::Unfortunately, that may just be a necessary evil. The new ad will be turned on for the front page whether we make any changes or not; I'm just trying to help make sure that everything looks as good as possible for when it is turned on. If we don't make any changes, the homepage will end up looking something like the example I have at [[User:KyleH/dev2]]. Are there any specific changes that you would recommend for my [[User:KyleH/dev|suggestion]] (other than trying to make it look right for people that block ads)? I should emphasize that the change here only affects the homepage, and not the rest of the pages on the site. --[[User:KyleH|KyleH]]<staff /> <small>([[User talk:KyleH|talk]])</small> 16:29, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:29, 18 July 2008

Is anyone planning work on this wiki now that the game is out? I would gladly help, and am interested in knowing how many people would participate too, but I am wondering about a few things:

  • Is the focus of this wiki the books or the game? Based on that, should new pages related to the game be in a special namespace / category, or just in the main namespace?
  • How will spoiler information be hidden? I particularly hated going to the BioShock wikia and seeing that the main story was spelled out on the main page at one point. I think Wikipedia's "spoiler warning: spoilers below" is insufficient, and instead we could possibly make tags like on forums, where in a spoiler the text is the same color as the background and you have to highlight it to see it, or even a collapsable part of the page where you would click on a "+" which would reveal the spoiler.
  • Will there be any protection for adult subject matter? I think we at least need to check if user is 13 years old, though I'm not an expert in the contexts where this is legally required - Wikipedia for example has sex-related pages publicly available without any age verification...

Anyways, if someone can answer these and then we can get the ball rolling... --Jean seb 17:13, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

I'm the admin of the wiki, although I'm not very active lately.

  • The focus of the wiki is both the game and the books. Pages related to the game don't need to be in another namespace, though, although on pages for characters, places etc. information from the books should come first, followed by information from the game under a separate heading (and by information from other adaptations).
  • Frankly, I don't think the wiki should have any spoiler tags, although general information on each topic should be separated from plot information, which should be under a separate heading.
  • As for adult subjects, I don't think it's necessary.

Ausir 23:47, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

Ok, so I'll start adding things and see if others can fill in the blanks. Please feel free to move things around if you see a need. My goal for now will be adding info, so it might not be in the right place at first... --Jean seb 01:10, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

Try out the new CreatePage tool!

Hullo! I am Kirkburn, a Wikia gaming Helper, and I'm here to tell you about something new we've enabled on your wiki - a new version of the Special:CreatePage tool!

"The latest incarnation of the create page tool introduces a brand new feature – createplates. These are predefined layouts for certain types of pages that will enable users to quickly and painlessly create pages adhering to the wiki's style and formatting guidelines."

We've been working on it for a while, and I find it pretty useful and easy to use. Some wikis already use "preloads" and similar techniques to do this - this is essentially an interactive and fully integrated version of that.

The all-important links
  • Special:CreatePage - This is the main page of the interface. You can display this link anywhere you want users to create new pages (on the Main Page, on category pages, or in the Mediawiki:Sidebar).
  • MediaWiki:Createplate-list - the list of createplates (which you can edit). You can change these to match you existing templates, delete or create new ones.
  • MediaWiki:Createplate-Character - one of the createplates (such pages are linked by MediaWiki:Createplate-list).
Help and feedback
  • A more detailed walkthough of this new product and how to use and customize the createplates can be found on Inside Wikia at w:c:inside:CreatePage.
  • As this is a new product we are actively seeking your feedback - both bug reports and suggestions for improvements. Please share your thoughts on the Inside Wikia forum thread.

Enjoy! If you have any questions, please leave a message on my talk page and I will get back to you :) Kirkburn (talk) 21:55, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

As an extended note, if this is overwhelming, don't worry. Start small, try testing it out with some deletable sandboxes so you get a feel for how it works (you could even try recreating already existing articles with it). Next, try editing the createplates to see the effect - e.g. change section names to better fit the wiki. Feel free to remove createplates that your wiki will never use.

Createplates do not need to be complex - if certain pages don't need an infobox don't feel you need to keep one on the createplate. Their most important function is to make creating new articles much easier and allows articles to be kept much more standardised, meaning less work for others to clean up. Kirkburn (talk) 22:25, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Createpage in use!

Hullo! As an update on this so you can see it in action, I have tried it out on the Metal Gear wiki. I took an article, Mei Ling, and attempted to recreate it with Special:Createpage.

I did this by editing MediaWiki:Createplate-Character to use an existing character template, and by copying the text into the various boxes on Special:Createpage ... the result was User:Kirkburn/Mei Ling, which required a fair bit less typing and tweaking than normally.

However, speed and consistent formatting is not the only benefit! If you look at http://metalgear.wikia.com/index.php?title=User:Kirkburn/Mei_Ling&action=edit you can see it uses something called "multiedit" which uses some extra info from the page to help present it better.

It would be awesome if this could be set up in a way that more people use it - it shouldn't require much work from an admin to get a basic page layout sorted - any help is appreciated! Kirkburn (talk) 00:31, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

Wikia Gaming IRC channel

You may be interested to know there is a Wikia gaming IRC channel, #wikia-gaming on chat.freenode.net, where you can hop on, ask for help from users of other gaming wikis, or offer your own experiences. If you are not familiar with IRC clients, you can access it from http://irc.wikia.com/gaming.

Different people may be on sporadically, but we organize weekly chats at a fixed time so we can get the most number of people online at the same time to ask and answer questions, or just to hang out. The admins of some of Wikia's biggest gaming wikis (e.g. WoW, Halo) often attend them. You can find the time for the next chat by following this link.

If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask me! Kirkburn (talk) 22:31, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Manuscript: a new custom look

I've taken the liberty to enable a new, customized look on the Witcher wiki. It's my take on Wikia's new Monaco skin, custom tailored for Witcher, with a color set based on CD Projekt's community website.

I've dubbed this theme Manuscript, since it's dominant colour is this parchment-like light yellow, with some blueish 'ink' on the headers.

Hope you like it.

Of course, this being a wiki, there's always room for improvement. Any suggestions & comments are very welcome and should be directed to my talk page.

Best regards, TOR 00:49, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

Homepage design

Hi guys!

My name is Kyle, and I work with Wikia's Gaming Team. As I'm sure you've noticed, we recently made some changes to the way that our wikis look. If you haven't already, check out Wikia's New Style on Central Wikia. One of the changes that we are making is that we will be adding a ad to the homepage of the wiki. In order to ensure that the homepage will continue to work properly when the ad is enabled, it must be redesigned using special main page column tags.

I've taken a stab at redesigning the homepage with these tags at User:KyleH/dev. I'd appreciate it if you could take a look at it and let me know what you think. Feel free to edit it yourself, or if you have any specific suggestions, let me know and I'll try to fix them for you. I've tried to make as few overall changes as possible, but you're welcome to change it as drastically if you'd like.

I'm sorry for the extra bit of work, but let me know if you have any questions or if I can help in any way. Thanks!

--KyleH (talk) 22:26, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

I see nothing that displeases me :) It seems just fine. Game widow 19:48, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
Having an adblocker running, I did not actually notice there was one. That said, comparing the two versions, the suggested version seems to be more cramped if you like with the ad taking a large chunk of the main page (and likely other pages as well?) and being more visible than previously, when it is confined to the right border and can be ignored by the user. Can you describe whether a page will have a huge blank box taking up a certain amount of space in the new version when an ad blocker is running or display the same way they do currently? GhostNWN 19:52, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
Yeah, I understand how you say that the design looks a little bit cramped. I tried to rearrange it so that the most important information is in the main body of the page while some of the other details are off to the side a little. I think that one of the reasons it looks cramped is the part at the very top of the left side. For some reason, it simply doesn't seem to balance well. Do you have any ideas for making it look a little bit better?
I'm afraid that I don't run an ad blocker so I don't know how the page looks with one enabled. Try taking a look at WoWWiki or FFXIclopedia. Both of them already have the new homepage tags enabled, so you can see for yourself how your ad blocker will affect the page. --KyleH (talk) 22:10, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
Hello KyleH, I had a look at them and these are the screenshots
FF
WW
They do look like they are missing a chunk in a way so personally I prefer the current layout. However our bureaucrats are free to overrule me ;) GhostNWN 13:16, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
Unfortunately, that may just be a necessary evil. The new ad will be turned on for the front page whether we make any changes or not; I'm just trying to help make sure that everything looks as good as possible for when it is turned on. If we don't make any changes, the homepage will end up looking something like the example I have at User:KyleH/dev2. Are there any specific changes that you would recommend for my suggestion (other than trying to make it look right for people that block ads)? I should emphasize that the change here only affects the homepage, and not the rest of the pages on the site. --KyleH (talk) 16:29, 18 July 2008 (UTC)