FANDOM


  • Is it really good to have people of whom we do not know name of labelled as "unnamed"? That could potentially mislead the readers that, let's say, Dijkstra's kids died before he was able to name them.

      Loading editor
    • I put it that way to note that they do have children (or spouse, brother, relative, etc.) but we don't know their names. Unless you can think of a better way to note that? Unfortuantely trying to use "unknown" doesn't really work here as otherwise that could apply to everyone theortically that they have unknown parents (just never met them) rather "unnamed" notes they do recognize they knew their parent, sibling, etc. just we (the readers) were never told their names.

        Loading editor
    • I'd personally prefer just "a wife" and "a number of children" in case of Dijkstra and others

        Loading editor
    • Eh, using "a" doesn't really fit well grammatically. For example, say you have someone who was married more than once but didn't know the names of one of them. It'd read like "a wife (deceased), Lily" which doesn't go well together. Essentially "a" only works if there's a single name in that related field.

        Loading editor
    • :<
      
        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
Give Kudos to this message
You've given this message Kudos!
See who gave Kudos to this message
Community content is available under CC-BY-SA unless otherwise noted.